499 days. The findings letter came. It has no findings in it.
On October 7 I published 490 Days. That same morning I sent three emails: a formal status request to the Internal Affairs detective on PSU-25-0214, a follow-up to the Attorney General on my August 22 request for independent review, and a new request to the Attorney General’s Prosecutors Supervision Unit.
Six days later, a letter dated October 13 arrived from the Morris County Prosecutor’s Office, Professional Standards Unit. Here is the entire finding on the three police departments:
“The matters involving the local police departments were reviewed and it was determined that all actions taken by those involved were consistent with department rules and regulations. Accordingly, this Office will close its file and take no further action.”
Two sentences. That is what 287 days produced.
📌 What the letter does not contain.
Which complaints were reviewed. Who was interviewed. Which rules and regulations were applied. A finding of fact. A report. I was interviewed on December 30, 2025. The detective’s last communication to me was January 21, 2026 — 265 days before this letter. In between, nothing was asked of me. Not a follow-up question. Not a document.
📌 What “consistent with department rules and regulations” covers.
In June 2025, on the first day I asked for help, I told a police officer that a man had brought a gun into my home and that I was afraid for my life. I was told I would “never” get a restraining order. Days later my home security system, my cameras and my accounts were accessed, and I was told it was “not a violation.” All of it, according to this letter, consistent with department rules and regulations. If that is true, the rules are the problem. If it is not true, the review is.
📌 The other half of the letter.
My complaint about the physician has been “forwarded to the Morris County Prosecutor’s Office Sex Crimes Unit for investigation.” The Sex Crimes Unit has had this matter since February 2026. It is the unit that wrote to me, “There is no rush.” Forwarding a case to the unit that already has it is not an investigative step. It is a sentence in a letter.
📌 The conflict has not changed.
This is the same office that went to court in 2025, in the Prosecutor’s name, to take the gun — and called him “the victim.” That office has now reviewed the police departments that handled my reports and found nothing.
📌 The Attorney General.
⏳ 55 days since my August 22 request for an independent review. 9 days since the follow-up. No acknowledgment.
Six days after I asked in writing for a status, I got a closure. I am not going to call the timing proof of anything. It is just the record, and the record is the point.
What happens next: this closure goes to the Attorney General with my pending request for review. A closure with no findings is a decision, and decisions can be reviewed. I am asking for that review, and I am asking for the file.
Last week I asked who decides when a case is worth investigating. This week I have a second question: when a 287-day review ends in two sentences with no findings, who reviews the reviewers?
